Is it really IN the water?
A new theory about this mess
I highly recommend people listen today to the debate between Dr. Ardis and Dr. Kirsch. If you haven’t seen the video yet in regards to this new snake venom theory of SARS CoV-2, I will link at the bottom of this post. I will link two interviews: one with Dr. Ardis and Stew Peters (honestly, not really my favorite guy), and Dr. Ardis and Mike Adams. I find Dr. Ardis’ theory intriguing but it has left many of us with more questions. If you haven’t seen the video (s) stop reading this and go watch. The link is to Steve Kirsch’s Substack, but ignore his commentary and watch the videos so you do not have a bias going into it. Here are my thoughts and I mirror what Steve says:
It makes complete sense that venom is what is poisoning people who get covid and who are ‘vaccinated”. But How? Dr. Ardis theorizes it must be in the water, but that makes little sense to me given the fact that the sheer amount of coordination it would take to poison the water of the world, so let’s step back a bit. I theorize that through chimeric manipulation used in gain of function research (if you don’t know what I mean, I am happy to elucidate in the comments) why wouldn’t these scientists be able to splice in the gene that snakes have allowing them to make venom? When the virus, with the genetic code for this venom enters a body, the cells get the gene to create the protein. It’s not far-fetched and it seems plausible to me with where the technology is at this moment in time. If they can create a lab-made virus that has pieces and parts from HIV, a bat coronavirus, and possible a rabies aspect all built in the spike protein, why not a snake? DNA research proves that CoV-2 is more closely related to snakes than any other animal: bats, pangolins, etc etc….this was found early in in January 2020. Can you believe that? And the scientist who found it is DEAD. (supposedly due to a ‘marital spat"‘ bc you know, those typically end in death) You will find all these details when you watch the videos, but the theory (besides the water aspect) all makes so much sense. I implore you to follow Popular rationalism as well. Dr. James Lyons-Weiler is a molecular biologist and is a great resource for science and a non-biased measured approach to such things.
~Sara
Weather it be snake venom copies, food supply alterations or another "delivery" system, today's science has outgrown it's ability to make intelligent decisions.
I understand progress requires risk, that's growth I get it. What I see in science today is more closely connected to profit than the advancement of humanity. This is where the danger resides.